Links to material and slides for this course can be found on github.
Or can be downloaded as a zip archive from here.
Once the zip file in unarchived. All presentations as HTML slides and pages will be available in the directories underneath.
There are several single cell sequencing technologies. The most common is from 10X Genomics.
overview
We often need many tools across several computational languages to analyze these complex experiments. Deciding what is appropriate often depends on the data set and its QC metrics. Our first step is nearly always to run Cell Ranger.
overview
Cell Ranger is a suite of tools for single cell processing and analysis available from 10X Genomics. It performs key processing steps i.e. demultiplexing, conversion to FASTQ and mapping. It is also the first chance to delve into your data sets QC.
In this session we will give a brief overview of running this tool and then dive deeper into interpreting the outputs.
Often genomics centers will run it for you and deliver mtx/hdf5 files (i.e. here at Rockefeller)
Why run Cell Ranger yourself?:
Cell Ranger is available from the .link[10x genomics website]
Also available are pre-baked references for Human and Mouse genomes (GRCh37/38 and GRCm37)
[This will all be in terminal on the server you are using]
wget -O cellranger-8.0.0.tar.gz "https://cf.10xgenomics.com/releases/cell-exp/cellranger-8.0.0.tar.gz?Expires=1711772964&Key-Pair-Id=APKAI7S6A5RYOXBWRPDA&Signature=muvzcbqxba6d-blyYS02MVfLlzwZk6iZNQWXdaoCLnl7owW2nEN-IHwSPwdNoYl-6Xia7rr0S1sLCUQTsekGm2pQKcd0kqK~ndHK0DM7SwSVpXLlRvBV5pXt~EIlsxATVBKVeQLnUy698N-WnRlT~ahjlU-nMdpomX9-lOkF~w8gbgHBdtPXunTWfW87sSJLpHMDVENSF7TFJsXERDwDnsXyQLCuEhfGTCOnupkaATlLEr9kaeCStePKkwGyqgi1m8Ua02NNGHWPIJ6I1mDt695wo~dgptpJF4SDNRTyE-TuXrHfIqRjZB60zhWRJczFo2kpL7FCKwliE-vJ6djcSw__"
Download reference genome for Cell Ranger i.e. Human genome (GRCh38)
wget "https://cf.10xgenomics.com/supp/cell-exp/refdata-gex-GRCh38-2024-A.tar.gz"
tar -xzvf cellranger-8.0.0.tar.gz
tar -xzvf refdata-gex-GRCh38-2020-A.tar.gz
export PATH=/PATH_TO_CELLRANGER_DIRECTORY/cellranger-8.0.0:$PATH
Typically you will have FASTQ files from your experiment (or downloaded from a repository like GEO). These are likely to have been generated using the Cell Ranger mkfastq toolset to produce a directory of FASTQ files.
As we have the downloaded Cell Ranger software and required pre-build reference for Human (GRCh38) we can generate count data from the FASTQ files. This will make a count matrix and associated files.
cellranger count --id=my_run_name \
--fastqs=PATH_TO_FASTQ_DIRECTORY \
--transcriptome=/PATH_TO_CELLRANGER_DIRECTORY/refdata-gex-GRCh38-2020-A
--create-bam=true
If you are working with a genome which is not Human and/or Mouse you will need to find another source for your Cell Ranger reference.
Having completed the Cell Ranger count step, the user will have created a folder, with the name set by the –id flag from the count command.
Within this folder there will be the outs/ directory which contains all the outputs generated from Cell Ranger count.
The count matrices which are needed for further analysis are stored in both MEX and HDF5 formats within the output directories.
The filtered matrix only contains detected, cell-associated barcodes whereas the raw contains all barcodes (background and cell-associated).
MEX format - filtered_feature_bc_matrix - raw_feature_bc_matrix
HDF5 format - filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5 - raw_feature_bc_matrix.h5
The outs directory may also contain a BAM file of alignments for all barcodes against the reference (possorted_genome_bam.bam) as well as an associated BAI index file (possorted_genome_bam.bam.bai). This depends on whether you put true or false in the –create-bam argument. Older versions of Cell Ranger did not have this argument and would default to producing this BAM file.
This BAM file is sometimes used in downstream analysis such as scSplit/Velocyto as well as for the generation of signal graphs such as bigWigs.
Cell Ranger also outputs cloupe.cloupe files for visualization within the .link[10X Loupe browser software].
This allows for the visualization of scRNA-seq/snRNA-seq as a t-sne/umap with the ability to overlay metrics of QC and gene expression onto the cells in real time.
Assessment of the overall quality of a scRNA-seq/snRNA-seq experiment after Cell Ranger can give our first chance to dig into the quality of your dataset and gain insight any issues we might face in data analysis.
There are many potential issues which can arise in scRNA-seq/snRNA-seq data including:
Cell Ranger will also output summaries of useful metrics as a text file (metrics_summary.csv) and as a intuitive web-page.
Metrics include
We will be looking at the web summary generated from a PBMC dataset with ~1,000 cells from a healthy human donor. The full experiment details can be found on the 10X website .link[here] and you can get a copy of a web summary from Cell Ranger version 8 .link[here].
[NOTE: Older web summaries contain largely the same information, but slightly different layout]
The web summary html file contains an interactive report describing the most essential QC for your single cell experiment as well as initial clustering and dimension reduction for your data.
The web summary also contains useful information on the input files and the versions used in this analysis for reproducibility.
The first thing we can review is the Run Summary information panel. (Top Left) As most people do not run Cell Ranger themselves this is important to check it matches expectations.
A corresponding section of the web summary is the Command Line Arguments used to run Cell Ranger. (Bottom) Again this is an important section to double-check to make sure everything was run correctly.
The Sequencing panel highlights information on the quality of the Illumina sequencing. Top Right.
Key Metrics we look for:
Q30 Bases in RNA Read > 65% (usually > 80%)
Sequencing Saturation > 40% (usually range 20% ~ 80%)
The Mapping panel highlights information on the mapping of reads to the reference genome and transcriptome. Bottom Left
Key Metrics we look for:
Mapped to Genome > 60% (usually range 50% ~ 90%)
Reads Mapped Confidently to Transcriptome > 30% (usually > 60%)
The Cells panel highlights some of the most important information in the report: the total number of cells captured and the distribution of counts across cells and genes. Top Right. Their importance is clear as several metrics are repeated and placed as the headline of the report.
The Cells panel also has other metrics which help describe the depth and ambient RNA proportion. Top Right.
Key Metrics we look for:
Fraction Reads in Cells > 70% (usually > 85%)
Median reads per cell > 20,000/cell and estimated number of cells 500 - 10,000
The Cell panel also includes an interactive knee plot.
The knee plot shows:
On the x-axis, the barcodes ordered by the most frequent on the left to the least frequent on the right
On the y-axis, the frequency of each ordered barcode.
Highlighted in dark blue are the barcodes marked as associated to cells.
It is apparent that barcodes labelled blue (cell-associated barcodes) do not have a cut-off just based on the UMI count.
In newer versions of Cell Ranger a two step process is used to define cell-associated barcodes based on the EmptyDrops method (Lun et al.,2019).
If required, a –force-cells flag can be used with cellranger count to identify a specific number of cell-associated barcodes.
The Knee plot also acts a good QC tools to investigate differing types of single cell failure.
Whereas our previous knee plot represented a good sample, differing knee plot patterns can be indicative of specific problems with the single cell protocol. We will show you some examples of these below from real data.
In this example we see no specific cliff and knee suggesting a failure in the integration of oil, beads and samples (wetting failure) or a compromised sample.
If there is a clog in the machine we may see a knee plot where the overall number of samples is low.
There may be occasions where we see two sets of cliff-and-knees in our knee plot.
This could be indicative of a heterogenous sample where we have two populations of cells with differing overall RNA levels.
Knee plots should be interpreted in the context of the biology under investigation.
It is important to know what version and parameters were used to run Cell Ranger.
This cell calling step is continually updated and it can have a dramatic affect on your results. The .link[Web Summary] on 10X Genomics for this dataset is from Cell Ranger V3.0 if you want to compare.
Cell Ranger V8.0 was just released last month and, as with almost every prior version, there’s been a change in default parameters.
The web-summary also contains an analysis page where default dimension reduction, clustering and differential expressions between clusters has been performed.
Additionally the analysis page contains information on sequencing saturation and gene per cell vs reads per cell.
The t-SNE plot shows the distribution and similarity within your data.
The sequence saturation and Median genes per cell plots show these calculations (as show on summary page) over successive down sampling of the data.
By reviewing the curve of the down sampled metrics we can assess whether we are approaching saturation for either of these metrics.
Early issues with QC can manifest in many ways downstream. This is from a published dataset:
Fingers crossed there’s no QC issues.
Often at this step we wouldn’t make any decisions unless there is a clear complete failure. This is an important first step in setting expectations/preparing for what you may need to do for the dataset.
There are many tools both in R and python to dig further into QC and to tackle any analysis issues that arise. Many of these tools have pros and cons, but there is no one universal workflow for every dataset. We use a combination of Seurat, Bioconductor and python packages in our typical analysis workflows.
overview